>>>>> "CY" == C Y <smustudent1@yahoo.com> writes:
CY> CMUCL looked like a real pain to compile when I downloaded
CY> the source. Which one do you think is best?
You cannot build CMUCL from sources without a working CMUCL on either
the same or different platform. This is also true for SBCL, a CMUCL
derivative.
Now that the info reader works for Clisp, I have no need to build and
run GCL anymore. CMUCL probably runs as fast as GCL, but its bignum
performance is probably worse than GCL/GMP. Clisp is very good there.
For numerical work, CMUCL is the probably the best of the three.
Ray