On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 11:50:32 +0600
"Andrey G. Grozin" <A.G.Grozin@inp.nsk.su> wrote:
>
> I am using MuPAD 2.0.
So do I.
I have used MuPAD for 4 years. The only problem
is that it is not free (in the sense of freedom).
>
> What about MuPAD language, it mainly follows Maple. Some good data
> abstraction mechanisms (domains and categories) are inspired by Axiom.
This is the most important superiority of MuPAD over Maple.
However the price is rather high : the code is slow for
complicated data structures.
An interesting page about MuPAD is
http://www.loria.fr/~zimmerma/mupad/
More generally, there is a mailing list
in France about (future?) free cas, at that time only
in French, but things may change on request:
calcul-formel-libre@math.cnrs.fr
To subscribe/unsubscribe:
mail calcul-formel-libre-request@math.cnrs.fr
subject subscribe/unsubscribe
The archive of the list may be seen at:
http://www.math.cnrs.fr/archives/calcul-formel-libre/
Best regards.
--
Daniel Duparc <daniel.duparc@free.fr>
29 av. de la Commune de Paris
94400 Vitry sur Seine (France)