On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 10:16, Raymond Toy wrote:
> >>>>> "Ole" == Ole Rohne <ole.rohne@cern.ch> writes:
>
> Ole> Yes, I know I shouldn't fix what is not broken. However, for a
> Ole> suitable definition of the b-word, SLOOP *is* broken. I do see the
>
> I think we should get rid of sloop, but not for the 6.0 release.
> Maybe the next one?
I certainly appreciate the desire to dump SLOOP. I agree, however, that
we shouldn't dump it in the 6.0 release.
Perhaps we should consider a more general ANSI cleanup for the 6.1
series?
--Jim, who is way behind on Maxima mail these days.