ellipt.lisp compile problems with the new make system

>>>>> "James" == James Amundson <amundson@fnal.gov> writes:

    James> On Wed, 2002-01-16 at 09:18, Raymond Toy wrote:
    >> Cool.  But you stuck in ellipt.lisp.  Shouldn't it go in some more
    >> "global" file that's loaded very early?  Just in case other (new)
    >> pieces of code want it before ellipt.lisp has been loaded?

    James> I know it looks a little goofy. Here's the rationale: (1) I hope gcl
    James> will get its own destructuring-bind before too long. (2) I don't want to
    James> muck with the 5.6 system any more than absolutely necessary. (3) I want
    James> the code to build under both old and new build systems.

I forgot about the old build system.  I haven't been able to use that
for a long time.

    James> If the local destructuring-bind code lasts past 5.9.0 (i.e., gcl isn't
    James> fixed soon), I propose we move it to a separate file.

Sounds good.

Ray