Hi Dan! I'll be trying to look at this too, as the lisp:let shows up
all over the place, and that is what is currently blocking my ports
too.
Does anyone know why maxima must redefine 'let'? I don't know if it
is significant, but 'let' in gcl is implemented in C, not compilable
lisp.
Take care,
Dan Stanger <dan.stanger@ieee.org> writes:
> I tested maxima on ms windows, using a cvs that I had from March 18,
> 2001, with the gcl that
> I built yesterday using mingw. It built, with one problem, cmpinclude.h
> was being included
> using < instead of ". It made most of the tests except for nusum and
> ode2, which it segfaulted on.
> I then got maxima-pre59 from cvs, and the build failed, with the
> LISP:LET error.
> So something broke between then and now. I have uploaded the March
> 18,2001 to my
> web site http://www.diac.com/~dxs/maxima-cvs-3-18-2001.tar.gz.
> If someone with more lisp expertise than me could look at the diffs,
> that would be great.
> Dan Stanger
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gcl-devel mailing list
> Gcl-devel@gnu.org
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
>
>
--
Camm Maguire camm@enhanced.com
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah