Raymond Toy writes:
> If it were me, I'd just blow away all the macros that shadow functions
> and declare those functions as inline and then complain to my Lisp
> vendor if they don't inline functions. :-)
Right, just what I think about that matter. Macros are not for
speed. You should use them for introducing new syntax and use inline
for what is was invented.
The only bad thing about that is, that for gcl, clisp and cmucl we
don't have a lisp vendor. :-(
But maybed the maintainers of these lisp compilers are willing to
improve the situation.
Andreas
--
Wherever I lay my .emacs, there´s my $HOME.