Raymond Toy <toy@rtp.ericsson.se> writes:
> I suppose we add code so that plus and minus were special so that you
> couldn't assign values to them, but this seems very ugly. Where do
> you stop? And why should I be disallowed from giving values to my
> variable named plus?
We already have %PI and %E... If we go that way, INF and MINF
could be other candidates for promotion to constancy.
OTOH, it is probably easier to fix the error message...
Ole