Re: update on fast mult benchmark



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thanks James for these numbers, but what do they mean?

Here are my naive conclusions (naive on purpose):

1) Maxima should run on CMUCL... it seems so fast!!! 
The new results with GCL are fine, but you are still at
half the speed!!! 

To someone who has never done symbolic programming,
this appears surprising. I work mostly on signal processing
applications... and if you can get something done twice as
fast, it is worth a major paper...!!!

Why are the numbers sooo different? And what can we tell
from this one benchmark?


2)  Mathematica and Maple are soooo slow. The result is
not surprising as far as Maple goes because I know it is 
really, really slow and programming Maple is typically a 
waste of time... but I'm surprised Mathematica does so badly???







-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8pMPL905gYRZSiE0RApKrAKC7pS1yMI7oPtH6KH1R68QNjXlcqACfbfhF
CuajJkxRHhLEJuB3PlCTYJI=
=2iFk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----