Numerical routines ready



Greetings!

Raymond Toy <toy@rtp.ericsson.se> writes:

> >>>>> "James" == James Amundson <amundson@fnal.gov> writes:
> 
>     James> On Fri, 2002-04-26 at 12:10, Raymond Toy wrote:
>     >> 
>     >> I think everything is in place now for the numerical routines from
>     >> SLATEC.  I've tested this mostly with CMUCL and some with Clisp.  I
>     >> can't test with gcl, so I hope some can do that for me.
> 
>     James> Unfortunately, the GCL build is now broken because gcl does not have
>     James> defpackage. I think the solution to this is to steal a "defpackage" from
>     James> another lisp. If nobody else wants to do this, I'll give it a shot a
>     James> little later. I'm still finishing up my work on xmaxima.
> 
> Alternatively, I suppose I can conditionalize the code on gcl and, for
> gcl, use make-package, in-package, and export directly.  However, this
> is hard for me to test since my gcl doesn't work.
> 
> Or we can always just wait for gcl to support this before we support
> gcl. :-)
> 

Does the current cvs support for defpackage work for you now?

Take care,

> Ray
> _______________________________________________
> Maxima mailing list
> Maxima@www.math.utexas.edu
> http://www.math.utexas.edu/mailman/listinfo/maxima
> 
> 

-- 
Camm Maguire			     			camm@enhanced.com
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah