Raymond Toy <toy@rtp.ericsson.se> writes:
> This also fixes things. However, when I load the translated file and
> try harm_foo(1,10), I get a warning about |$i| being undefined with
> CMUCL, but not Clisp. It does, however, return the correct value.
Does this warning come from
harm_foo(l,u):=block(mode_declare([l,u],fixnum),
sum(1/i,i,l,u));
or rather from
harm_bar(l,u):=sum(1/i,i,l,u);
I am asking this because translating harm_foo only involves the trans1
patch but not the the fcall patch, and the generated code is
essentially a DO loop with |$i| bound by an init form, which should
not give any trouble.
Anyway, in the case where CMUCL gives the warning could you please
check if the generated lisp code is essentially the same as the code
generated by Clisp? (Sorry for asking you to do this but I have only
Clisp installed.)
Wolfgang
--
wjenkner@inode.at