compile_file extensions



Raymond Toy <toy@rtp.ericsson.se> writes:

> The extensions used for compile_file are "LISP" and "UNLISP".  I think
> it would be nicer if they were "lisp" and "unlisp".
> 
> I have a simple patch ready for this.  Is there a reason I'm not aware
> of for why the extensions need to be uppercase?

Maybe in order to avoid name clashes.  It would be annoying to have
some .lisp file accidentally overwritten by a generated file of the
same name.  This can easily happen if you are writing some .mac file
any you want to rewrite some functions in lisp.  I find it actually
quite convenient to choose the same name in this case.

Wolfgang
-- 
wjenkner@inode.at