symbolic integtn/diffn of Maxima best of any open source system??
Subject: symbolic integtn/diffn of Maxima best of any open source system??
From: C Y
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 09:25:49 -0800 (PST)
--- Richard Fateman <fateman@cs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> > Integration is where the real test lies. Maxima, as far
> > as I know, can pretty much hold its own against Maple and
> > Mathematica in that department, and for some tasks is better.
>
> Both Maple and Mathematica have improved substantially
> and the commercial version of Macsyma has also made many
> improvements on the free version, in this area. This is
> especially true for definite integration and special
> functions.
Hmm. So we have work to do. I don's suppose there's a
more specific list anywhere of areas where they are ahead?
> > I don't know of any other open source program which can
> > make that claim. (Just had a thought - does anyone know
> > what Axiom's capabilities are in that department?)
>
> Some of Axiom's capabilities in indefinite symbolic
> integration of algebraic functions are, I think, superior.
Really? I thought algebraic functions were the closest thing
to a simple case of integration out there. How do they improve
on us? (And what should we do to catch up?)
CY
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com