Dan Stanger <dan.stanger@ieee.org> writes:
> I am willing to either change the name of the function
> to FREEOFL or modify existing usage of FREEOFL to LFREEOF.
Maybe it's better to leave the name as it is since you carefully chose
it that way. At some point I might redefine FREEOFL to simply call
LFREEOF.
> [...] I will go back to LFREEOF and modify it then.
> Does this sound reasonable?
Up to you to decide, of course. I just wanted to know what was going
on. Thanks for explaining.
Wolfgang
--
wjenkner@inode.at