3 things



Hi Martin,


Martin RUBEY writes:
 > You are very right. The name TAYLOR is somewhat misleading. There is a 
 > bug(fix) you should consider (applying) when using taylor together with 
 > sums:
 > 
 > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=663873&group_id=4933&atid=104933
 > 

Is this checked into CVS?  If so, I have it already.  Come to think of it, 
I've been building from CVS, and thus is what I call rc4 the same as what
the rest are?  I'm using the HEAD tag in updating.

 > (well, the second of the two)
 > 
 > The following happens in unpatched maxima if you feed taylor with a sum 
 > that contains the expansion variable as a limit:
 > 
 > (C1) taylor(sum(k,k,0,m),m,0,3);
 > 
 > (D1)/T/                            k + . . .
 > 
 > Concerning extensions: The algolib group at inria developed software for 
 > maple, it is certainly worth it to do the same for maxima. However, this 
 > is maybe a demanding task.
 > 
 > http://algo.inria.fr/libraries/libraries.html#gdev
 > 
 > (you are into chemistry, not maths, aren't you?)
 > 

I'm a theoretical chemist, so math is good part of what I do.  As to
porting something from maple to maxima, sounds good, but I'd really
have to learn lisp then, right? :)

 > Martin
 > 
 > 
 > > 3. It seems that TAYLOR is somewhat more clever than the documentation
 > >    would indicate.  Consider:
 > > 
 > > (C1) f(x):=1+1/x+exp(-x)*(1+1/x);
 > > 				   1		     1
 > > (D1) 		       f(x) := 1 + - + EXP(- x) (1 + -)
 > > 				   x		     x
 > > (C2) taylor(f(x),x,inf,2);
 > > 		     1		      1		   - x
 > > (D2)/T/ 	 1 + - + . . . + (1 + - + . . .) %E    + . . .
 > > 		     x		      x
 > > 
 > > This is neither a Taylor or Laurent series, but is very useful in
 > > assymptotic analysis of expressions.  I don't know how robust this
 > > behavior is, for example:
 > > 
 > > (C1) taylor(sin(x)/(1+x),x,inf,3);
 > > TAYLOR encountered an essential singularity in:
 > > SIN(x)
 > >  -- an error.  Quitting.  To debug this try DEBUGMODE(TRUE);)
 > > 
 > > Rather than giving an error, it might be nice to have the option of
 > > keeping the sin (or any other essentially singular function, like
 > > exp(-x)) explicit and taylor expanding the rest; i.e.,
 > > 
 > > 		     sin(x)/x  -sin(x)/x**2 + ...
 > > 
 > > 
 > > In any event this behavior is undocumented.
 > > 
 > > David
 > > _______________________________________________
 > > Maxima mailing list
 > > Maxima@www.math.utexas.edu
 > > http://www.math.utexas.edu/mailman/listinfo/maxima
 > > 
 > 
 > 
 > _______________________________________________
 > Maxima mailing list
 > Maxima@www.math.utexas.edu
 > http://www.math.utexas.edu/mailman/listinfo/maxima
 >