Install on Windows



--- James Amundson <amundson@fnal.gov> wrote:
> I plan to put together a triage list after another day or two of
> reports have come in. Most of the issues mentioned so far on the list

> are either familiar or unsurprising to me.
> 
> Yours are the exceptions. I am surprised by all three problems you
> had:
> 
> On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 12:01, C Y wrote:
> > Well, I tried the install on my Windows box at work.  I only note a
> > few problems, most minor and probably none severe enough to justify

> > a further delay.
> > 
> > 1) In the html intro, the maxima logo has a messed up background. 
> > Probably the thing to do there is make a version of the logo with a
> > white background specifically for that page - I think the
> > transparency is causing issues.
> 
> I haven't seen a problem on any of the Windows platforms I've tried
> (XP, 2000 and 98). Does anyone else have this problem? 
> 
> Which platform are you on? Is it a color depth problem?

Win 98.  It could be a color depth issue, or perhaps it's the NVIDIA
card?  I tried it on one other computer (also Win 98) and didn't have
this problem, so it obviously isn't Windows 98 itself.

A fairly minor point I suspect.

> > 2) The file on sourceforge downloaded as a .exe.zip file, which it
> > isn't.  I had to rename it in the dos prompt.  Once I did that it
> > worked fine though.
> 
> That didn't happen for me. Anyone else?

The second computer I tried didn't have that happen.  It must have been
my browser.  My apologies - disregard.

> > 3)  The startup time was extremely long, on the order of 30-40
> > seconds.  I know this is a known problem but I'm almost postitive
it 
> > will be the number one bug report filed by people who try out 5.9.0

> > on Windows and will likely be a killer for some.  I don't propose 
> > holding up the release, which is after all a developer release, but

> > we should probably be ready for the reports this will generate. 
Has 
> > anyone figured out what might be causing it?  The most promising 
> > thing I recall was a report that smaller hard disks didn't have as 
> > long a wait, but 5.5beta doesn't seem to have that problem. 
Anyway, 
> > thought I'd mention it.
> 
> Again, I haven't seen this on any machine I've tried. Was this issue
> discussed on the list at some point? Do you have any idea what the
> problem could be?

It was discussed, but I can't remember where the thread is.  Anyone
remember it?  I don't have any useful ideas as to what to do about it. 
This one did occur on both Win 98 computers I tried it on.

CY

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com