FW: [Maxima] New release candidate with windows installer available
Subject: FW: [Maxima] New release candidate with windows installer available
From: Vadim V. Zhytnikov
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 20:45:48 +0300
Your suggestion looks very plausible to me. It also
explains why comiler tets passes to me on two
Windows installation and fails on others - on these
very two Windows installs I have mingw and msys
installed before. On all others (on all the test fails)
no any ming/msys/cigwin. But when I copied heder
files acciording to your recomendations - nothing
changed - compile(f) still fails. Maybe I'm doing
something wrong? What is the proper place for
the headers - Maxima-5.9.0.rc4/include I suppose?
Billinghurst, David (CRTS) ?????:
> I have identified the cause of the DESOLVE([EQN1, EQN2], [f(x), G(x)])
> failure you reported (see attached). Unfortunately the maxima list is rejecting my
> postings to the list
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CRTS
> Sent: Saturday, 1 February 2003 11:34 PM
> To: 'Nikolaos I. Ioakimidis'; 'James Amundson'
> Cc: 'maxima mailing list'
> Subject: RE: [Maxima] New release candidate with windows installer available
>
>
> I hate replying to my own mail. Ignore the fix in it. As is often the case,
> I found the real problem just after I posted the wrong fix.
>
> The problem is that a few of the gcc header files are missing, so that
> the compile test in rtest15.mac aborts and doesn't clean up after itself.
>
> The fix is to copy the following gcc files:
> lib/gcc-lib/mingw32/3.2/include/*.h (but not the subdirectories)
> include/math.h
> include/unistd.h
> include/io.h
> include/process.h
> include/sys/*.h
>
> then confirm that the compiler works
>
> (C1) f(x):=x+2;
> (D1) f(x) := x + 2
> (C2) compile(f);
> Compiling gazonk1.lsp.
> End of Pass 1.
> End of Pass 2.
> OPTIMIZE levels: Safety=2, Space=2, Speed=2
> Finished compiling gazonk1.lsp.
> (D2) [f]
> (C3)
>
--
Vadim V. Zhytnikov
<vvzhy@mail.ru>
<vvzhy@netorn.ru>