(rat)coeff question / proposal



I think that it is a bad idea that (rat)coeff returns zero, if it can't 
make the coefficient explicit, it should rather return 'ratcoeff...:

(C1) ratcoeff((1+x)^k,x,2);

(D1) 				       0
(C2) ratcoeff(x^k,x,2);

(D2) 				       0

because this way, it is impossible to determine from the output whether 
the coefficient is zero or it could not be determined...

Martin