meval / final question, hopefully



It seems that there are 2 1/2 solutions to the varlist/genvar problem:

1. Solution

protect all calls of those programs that use the genvars to communicate
internally to *any* exterior program. -- I realised that we would have to
protect all these calls because we cannot know whether the exterior 
program will use rat or friends some time in the future.

2. Solution

Of course, this can also done in the programs which are called, i.e. 
progbind varlist and genvar at all "entrypoints" to programs that use $rat 
or friends.

This is the approach that you took when suggesting to progbind varlist and 
genvar in fpolysum. 

2 1/2. Solution (well, not really a solution, this leads the idea of 
genvars ad absurdum)

change rat and friends so that either the DISREP property agrees with 
the varlist or a new symbol is created...


Because this has to be done systematically, I would like to have an answer 
like "1" or "2" or "depends on ... "

Thanks, Martin