Raymond Toy <toy@rtp.ericsson.se> writes:
> >>>>> "Vadim" == Vadim V Zhytnikov <vvzhy@mail.ru> writes:
>
> Vadim> SBCL patch right now. I've tried it and it seems
> Vadim> that SBCL support is in fairly good shape.
>
> There's no real reason why it would be any worse than CMUCL is there?
Please take a look at the patch to see. On top of what I described in
my original SBCL port message there was at least one type declaration
issue, problems with stream buffering (to be reconsidered) and various
pathname (?) annoyances (not solved at all, for laziness).
Wolfgang