> >> Since gcl/cmucl/sbcl/clisp all seem ok, I can check this patch
> >> in if you like.
> Yannick> That's fine with me.
>
> Ok, I'll do that soon.
>
> I noticed that you replaced some macros with compiler-macros. Any
> particular reason for that?
openmcl doesn't like it (i.e. gives a continuable error) when there is a
function foo and a macro foo. So I've replaced every instance of a macro
where there is a function with the same name by a compiler-macro.