>>>>> "Stavros" == Stavros Macrakis <stavros.macrakis@verizon.net> writes:
>> ...I guess all platforms that we're interested in support
Stavros> define-compiler-macro
Stavros> Speaking of which, do we have any sort of coding guidelines saying what
Stavros> we can and can't expect from the underlying Lisp? If you develop in GCL
Not that I'm aware of, other than we should strive to ANSI CL code.
Stavros> (avoiding implementation-specific features) can you expect the other
Stavros> Lisps to be supersets? Are there any specific CL features to be avoided
I think GCL could be considered a rough subset of all others, but it
seems gcl is moving pretty fast towards ANSI CL.
Stavros> because they're known to be flaky or grossly inefficient or whatever on
Stavros> some implementations?
Can't think of anything right now.
Ray