Jay Belanger <belanger@truman.edu> writes:
> Jesper Harder <harder@ifa.au.dk> writes:
>
>> 1. It's ugly.
>> 2. It's not editable. I.e. not suitable for selecting subexpressions
>> and feeding them back to Maxima.
>>
>> But I don't think that an approach involving TeX can ever be part of a
>> solution to problem 2.
>
> Well, TeXmacs seems to solve both problems (although part 2 still
> needs some work).
Yes, but TeXmacs isn't based on TeX.
The name is somewhat confusing, since TeXmacs is neither based on TeX
nor very similar to Emacs.