OK. w3m doens't have a problem with it, and it looks OK in IE5 on
Windows 98.
Anybody have anything else they think should get tested? I'm pretty
much out of browsers myself ;-).
CY
--- C Y <smustudent1@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Well, as an interesting aside, this little exercise has shown us that
> the Maxima crowd is rather current when it comes to browsers :-).
> Thanks to all the people who tested the page.
>
> So far, the results are OK for:
> Mozilla 1.0 (Windows NT 4.0), 1.2.1 (Linux), 1.3 (Linux, Windows XP,
> MacOSX 10.2.5)
> Konqueror 3.1.1, 3.1.1a (Linux)
> emacs-w3m (Linux probably?)
> IE6 (Windows XP, Windows 98)
> IE 5.2.2 (MacOSX 10.2.5)
> Safari public beta 2 (MacOSX 10.2.5)
> Camino 0.7.0 (MacOSX 10.2.5)
> Netscape 7.0.2 (MacOSX 10.2.5)
> Omniweb 4.2 (MacOSX 10.2.5)
> Opera 6.03, 7.1.0 Beta 1(Linux)
>
> Not perfect but tolerable on:
> Netscape 4.79 (Windows, Linux)
>
> Displays without formatting but cleanly on:
> Links 2.1pre6
> dillo 7.1
> lynx
>
> Anything else we should test on before going live with it?
>
> CY
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo
> http://search.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> Maxima mailing list
> Maxima@www.math.utexas.edu
> http://www.math.utexas.edu/mailman/listinfo/maxima
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo
http://search.yahoo.com