Names of Bessel functions (Re: half integer bessel)
Subject: Names of Bessel functions (Re: half integer bessel)
From: Raymond Toy
Date: 14 May 2003 08:51:56 -0400
>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Fateman <fateman@cs.berkeley.edu> writes:
Richard> If you want functions to provide numbers, the usual route
Richard> is notationally wasteful, with specific functions for
Richard> Bessel functions of integer order and real argument.
Richard> Then other functions for non-integer and/or complex order
Richard> and argument would have different program names.
I didn't quite follow this. What "usual route"?
Richard> One piece of guidance in this is to return the favor of Mathematica, which
Richard> did so much copying from other systems, including Macsyma, and use the
Richard> same notation as in Mathematica. BesselJ[n,x] which in Macsyma syntax
Richard> actually would be BesselJ(n,x) since Mathematica uses [] for enclosing
Richard> "function" arguments.
This is acceptable to me, but I would use bessel_j(n,x) instead of
BesselJ(n,x). (I hate typing Mathematica function names. Too many
shifted characters.)
Ray