>>>>> "Barton" == Barton Willis <willisb@unk.edu> writes:
[snip]
Barton> The message that "...requires less than one thousand
Barton> arguments" isn't very useful! With 50 members, max works
Barton> okay
[snip]
Barton> Maxima version: 5.9.0 Maxima build date: 19:10 2/9/2003
Barton> host type: i686-pc-mingw32 lisp-implementation-type: Kyoto
Barton> Common Lisp lisp-implementation-version: GCL-2-5.0
gcl 2.4.0 has a call-arguments-limit of 64.
CMUCL has a call-arguments-limit of most-positive-fixnum; clisp, most
positive 32-bit number. But ANSI CL says call-arguments-limit must be
at least 50. Presumably the others Lisps have limits close to
most-positive-fixnum.
Is maxima required to work around limitations of the underlying lisp?
Ray