On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 07:01, George N. White III wrote:
> If you want a way to use maxima from a matrix language, R should be
> considered. It is a more "modern" language than Matlab/Octave, and has a
> much larger user base. The most fundamental difference is that R has a
> concept of "NA" (missing data) separate from NaN's. I suspect the lisp
> heritage will make working with R more appealing than working with octave.
R is on my radar screen. I hope that one day we will have communication
with both R and Octave.
--Jim