James Amundson ÐÉÛÅÔ:
> I have recently checked code into cvs to support static installs under
> Clisp and CMUCL. By static install, I mean that support files from the
> lisp implementation are copied into the maxima directory structure.
> Installed maxima no longer depends on the external lisp files. (GCL
> installs have always had this property.) The additional disk space used
> is insignificant compared to the Maxima files.
>
> Static installs allow lisp developers to update their lisp installations
> without worrying about breaking an installed Maxima version. (This
> problem has bitten me.) They also allow binary packages to be
> distributed without external lisp dependencies.
>
> The build system does some funky things to guess the locations of the
> required lisp files. I would appreciate hearing positive and negative
> experiences with the new installation code.
>
> --Jim
>
I observe strange result of --list-avail with diffrent lisp:
[vadim@proxl test3]$ maxima -l gcl --list-avail
Available versions:
version 5.9.0.1cvs, lisp clisp
version 5.9.0.1cvs, lisp cmucl
version 5.9.0.1cvs, lisp gcl
version 5.9.0.1cvs, lisp sbcl
version 5.9.0.1cvs, lisp t
version 5.9.0.1cvs, lisp ata
[vadim@proxl test3]$ maxima -l cmucl --list-avail
Available versions:
version 5.9.0.1cvs, lisp clisp
version 5.9.0.1cvs, lisp cmucl
version 5.9.0.1cvs, lisp gcl
version 5.9.0.1cvs, lisp sbcl
version 5.9.0.1cvs, lisp t
version 5.9.0.1cvs, lisp ata
[vadim@proxl test3]$ maxima -l clisp --list-avail
Available versions:
version 5.9.0.1cvs, lisp sbcl
version 5.9.0.1cvs, lisp gcl
version 5.9.0.1cvs, lisp cmucl
version 5.9.0.1cvs, lisp clisp
[vadim@proxl test3]$ maxima -l sbcl --list-avail
Available versions:
version 5.9.0.1cvs, lisp clisp
version 5.9.0.1cvs, lisp cmucl
version 5.9.0.1cvs, lisp gcl
version 5.9.0.1cvs, lisp sbcl
--
Vadim V. Zhytnikov
<vvzhy@mail.ru>
<vvzhy@netorn.ru>