James Amundson ÐÉÛÅÔ:
> On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 15:35, Vadim V. Zhytnikov wrote:
>
>
>>But the important question is - do we *really* want to incorporate such
>>important change into 5.9.1 ?
>
>
> It's an important question. On one hand, I just announced a code freeze,
> so I can't break it without the permission of the list. On the other
> hand, potentially painful changes are better to get over sooner instead
> of later.
>
>
>> How about documentation,
>
>
> The instances of C#, D# and E# in the texi files can easily be changed
> by a pattern replacement.
>
But we have to proofread all docs after that. Lots of work actually.
>
>>xmaxima,
>
>
> I think xmaxima is unaffected. (I just tried it.)
>
Me too, good.
>
>>TeXmacs
>
>
> With the new interface code, TeXmacs will be immune to problems with
> prompts.
>
>
>>etc ?
>
>
> It's the "etc" that is bothering me most. I don't know what it is; I
> fear the unknown.
>
>
>>I venture to suggest postponing new line numbering scheme till
>>5.9.2 (not later).
>
>
> The plan was to have 5.9.2 be case-related issues *only*. We would have
> to wait until 5.9.3.
>
Sounds good for me.
--
Vadim V. Zhytnikov
<vvzhy@mail.ru>
<vvzhy@netorn.ru>