Jay Belanger <belanger@truman.edu> writes:
> Since breqn is only an option, it should probably be removed and
> replaced by a pointer of where to get it.
Yeah, or someone should try to contact the AMS. I imagine they'd be
sympathetic to clarifying the license -- it was probably intended to
be LPLL.
--
Jesper Harder <http://purl.org/harder/>;