RANDOM() and RANDOM(FALSE) problem



Partly to be argumentative, but maybe it will illuminate
the portability philosophy... Do we guarantee that sin/cos/exp/log
are all the same?  Or even decimal to binary conversion?

I would personally be very disappointed with a random() function
that was, say, 100 times slower than the native one. And that
might be the case.  If someone wants a machine independent random,
provide one in the share library.
:)


RJF


Stavros Macrakis wrote:

>Having the same generator on every platform would be ideal.
>
>Almost as good would be some cross-platform way of saying "I want to
>restart my random sequence from a defined point".
>
>        -s
>
>_______________________________________________
>Maxima mailing list
>Maxima@www.math.utexas.edu
>http://www.math.utexas.edu/mailman/listinfo/maxima
>  
>