--- "Viktor T. Toth" wrote:
> > I would propose that a script or scripts (maybe just a texi2html
> > configuration) to munge texinfo into a nicer html format be
> > developed independently of the texinfo files themselves.
>
> OK, I may have misunderstood the intent here. I gained the impression
> that what is being proposed is a rewrite of the existing
> documentation to conform to some formatting/organizational standard.
> If your goal is to produce tools that can work with the present
> texinfo files to produce better HTML, I'm all for it.
Sorry, I guess I didn't make myself clear. I don't want to replace
the texinfo files, I want to generate some different html from them.
I guess that is much less controversial. 8^)
> ([...] it's the content that should take precedence over
> appearance, not the other way around, and that we have to do
> a lot more to improve the content.)
We seem to be making progress (slowly) on both fronts.
I assure you more time is spent on content.
Thanks for your comments,
Robert Dodier
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - What will yours do?
http://my.yahoo.com