Raymond Toy writes:
> But, if I understand your derivation correctly, the ratio should be 1,
> not 4/3/sqrt(%pi).
It wouldn't be surprising if our definitions for various special
functions were slightly different from those given elsewhere. Of
course, it is absolutely essential to make them explicit, eventually.
No problem if you want to flag this as error instead, of course.
> And at first glance, the transform of H_1(t) is completely different
> from the answer given the DLMF.
Yes, I couldn't make sense of it, either :-(
In any case, I checked that the Laplace transform of H_1 and H_0 at
the DLMF site is actually compatible with their definition of the
Struve functions via integrals...
Wolfgang