Jim,
wxMaxima is beautiful. However, XMaxima is more stable when large
expressions pop up. Try (x+y+z)^100, expand(%) with XMaxima and wxMaxima. So
I'd not ditch XMaxima just yet... but there's no reason why we can't have
both, is there?
Viktor
-----Original Message-----
From: maxima-admin@math.utexas.edu [mailto:maxima-admin at math] On
Behalf Of James Amundson
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 6:22 PM
To: Mike Thomas
Cc: Maxima list
Subject: RE: [Maxima] wxMaxima 0.6.0
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 15:52, Mike Thomas wrote:
> It would reflect very positively on Maxima itself to include wxMaxima
> which, although not as featureful as XMaxima, has the air of solidity and
> responsiveness that hardened end-users expect on Windows.
I am seriously considering this proposal. What interests me is your
point of view that XMaxima is more featureful -- I would have said the
opposite. I really only use XMaxima for testing XMaxima, so maybe I'm
missing something. Which XMaxima features do you find lacking in
wxMaxima?
--Jim
_______________________________________________
Maxima mailing list
Maxima@www.math.utexas.edu
http://www.math.utexas.edu/mailman/listinfo/maxima