Re: Incomplete gamma and beta



> 
> 
>> (RJF) Maybe we need an analog of n(...,d), as a separate function, doing
>>something more careful than just
>>than
>>   n(h,d):=block([fpprec:d],bfloat(h));    ... this does computation in
>>d digits, but doesn't necessarily provide an answer that is right to d digits.
> 
> 
> I would love to see this, but it's pretty hard to do in general, isn't
> it?

Yes, but not impossible. First we need a complete suite of elementary
and not-so-elementary bigfloat functions, good to specified accuracy.

There are some features in Mathematica  (as well as commercial Macsyma)
that are closer than what we have in Maxima.

RJF

> 
> --Jim
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Maxima mailing list
> Maxima@www.math.utexas.edu
> http://www.math.utexas.edu/mailman/listinfo/maxima