Fix for [ 1173788 ] assigning operators - case sensi tivi ty problem?

--- Raymond Toy  wrote:
 
> With these changes, the last few tests in rtest13 can be enabled, and
> they all pass, except the errcatch.  The errcatch test doesn't work
> because the problem is in parsing, not in evaluation, so errcatch
> does nothing.  
> 
> I guess that means we can't test for case-sensitivity of these
> operators without adding some mechanism to allow the user to catch
> parsing errors.

Well, instead of errcatch(exp1 ou exp2); why not exp1+ou+exp2; ?
The intent seems to be to verify that "ou" is no longer
an operator -- if so, then ou should be recognized as an
ordinary variable.

Attempting to catch parsing errors is an interesting idea,
but doubtless fraught with peril ....

Incidentally I have never seen "fraught" in print except 
as "fraught with peril". But my reading is mostly limited
to man pages and People magazine. 

All the best,
Robert Dodier


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/