C Y wrote:
>
> P.S. Is the implimentation of ordergreat and orderless really as dumb
> as I think it is, or are there reasons it's done that way?
Could you be more explicit? Does it matter? The programs that
matter are "great" and its subroutines, which should be as efficient
as possible.
I can
> always write my own function to manipulate those lists but I wonder if
> the better course of action would be to improve/replace the current ones.
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Maxima mailing list
> Maxima@www.math.utexas.edu
> http://www.math.utexas.edu/mailman/listinfo/maxima