Need help with bizarre problem - maybe a new bug?



--- Wolfgang Jenkner  wrote:
 
> So, you can eliminate the calls to `ratsimp' and `ratdisrep' which
> you inserted as work-arounds in `processunits' (this would be the 
> best test for all this).

Tested on sbcl, works like a champ.  Thanks!  Eliminated the "false"
appearing out of nowhere too.
 
> (By the way, shouldn't `currentdoeval' be initialized to `true' when
> loading `unit.mac'?)

Done.  Changes committed.  Looking better and better.  I also set
ratprint to false inside processunits since any non-integer activity
seems to trigger it - if someone needs it I can make it an option
later.

CY

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com