>
> Yes, but I said "gamma(1+1/2*%i),numer". Shouldn't that give a
> numerical value?
>
Hmm. I guess I was too terse. If you want to be completely consistent with
base Maxima, it should not give a numerical value, since sin(0.5*%i+1.2),numer
doesn't, either. But that can be argued to be wrong. So it seems fine to me
that gamma(1+1/2*%i),numer should give a complex float, and maybe sin should
be changed, too....
-s