--- Stavros Macrakis wrote:
> Although I do like the idea of a record/object syntax for Maxima, it
> seems to me very premature to hardwire this @-syntax into mset.
I suppose - it's easy to change and/or take out though. The cvs
codebase is experimental, after all.
> If we must have something like this in the code sooner rather than
> later (which I'm not convinced of), let's at least make it
> controllable, e.g.
>
> ((assq (caar x) $mset_extension_operator)
> (funcall (cdr (assq (caar x) $mset_extension_operator)) x y))
Um... Dr. Fateman? Since you authored the changes, what would be the
best way to do that? I don't understand it well enough to attempt
editing it myself yet.
Cheers,
CY
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs