Robert Dodier writes:
> hello all,
>
> in order to keep moving towards a 5.9.2 release, i would like to propose
> that we make a cvs branch for 5.9.2.
>
> i propose that the base of the branch be the current cvs head.
> rationale: to the best of my knowledge there are no code changes
> in src/ in progress at this time, and the cvs head version compiles
> clean and passes run_testsuite.
>
> (the defstruct/mset stuff is in share/ at this time.
> i expect it will move into src/ after it settles.)
>
> as to a naming convention, raymond toy wrote the following --
>
> ray> How about release-5_9_2-base for the base of the branch,
> ray> RELEASE-5_9_2-BRANCH for the branch label? Various labels on the
> ray> branch will be release-5_9_2-. (Branch names in upper-case, tags
> ray> in lower case.)
>
> which sounds fine to me.
>
> ray says he'll go ahead if this scheme gets some support from the mailing list.
>
> comments?
>
> all the best,
> robert dodier
>
I second this nice proposal.
--
Vadim V. Zhytnikov