Reconsidering the GPL licensing of Maxima



On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Richard Fateman wrote:
> Bill's additions and corrections until (I think) 1990
> need not be restricted by GPL because they were given to DOE
> in DOE-MACSYMA and DOE has the rights to distribute. We see
> DOE is perfectly happy to release them
> under a more liberal license.
More liberal?? It is not even free in the "free beer" sense. Where can I 
get these sources without paying to DOE? If I get it, can I redistribute 
it for free?

I only contributed small pieces to maxima, mainly to mactex.lisp. I did it 
because this code is guaratneed to remain free forever by GPL. I don't 
want MathSoft or whatever to use results of my work without paying me. It 
you are going to change the license, please, insert back all the bugs in 
mactex.lisp which I have fixed.

Andrey Grozin