Re: Fwd: Maxima patches for Scieneer Common Lisp.



>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Dodier  writes:

    Robert> On 11/3/05, Raymond Toy  wrote:
    Robert> (2) (in-package "MAXIMA") --> (in-package :maxima) throughout -- no
    >> 
    >> Except for this objection, which I think I've answered, is there a
    >> reason not to apply this patch for scl?  It works ok for me with clisp
    >> and cmucl on Solaris.  A possibly nice side effect would be that
    >> maxima would compile and run using Allegro's modern-mode lisp, which,
    >> I think, is (was?) the default mode for Allegro.

    Robert> OK by me.

I'm ready to apply these patches, but I have one question.  Should the
files in the archive directory be left alone?  I think so, but I'm not
sure.

The slatec files will be patched in a different way, by regenerating
the files using slatec.system that has been patched to put :slatec as
the package instead of "SLATEC".

Ray