Maxima 5.9.3 release schedule



>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Dodier <robert.dodier at gmail.com> writes:

    Robert> linear algebra code, and there is a persistent bug in one
    Robert> of the test suite files.

Are you're talking about problem 65 and 68 in rtest_trig?  These
failures are caused by differing ideas on where the branch cuts for
the special functions are. I think we agreed a little while ago that
we should use CL special functions as much as possible, which Barton
implemented.

If we use the branch cuts as defined in CL [1], then our rectform
doesn't get them right.

For example, we fail the test (with cmucl) for atanh(-2).  According
to ANSI CL, atanh has a branch cut for on the real axis for x < -1
which is continuous with quadrant III.  Thus, atanh(-2) should be
-log(3)/2 - %i*%pi/2.  CMUCL gets this right.  Clisp produces
-log(3)/2 + %i*%pi/2. rectform(atanh(-2)) produces the same as Clisp.
(I think Clisp is buggy here.)

Problem 68 is the bigfloat equivalent to problems 65.  I think there
are some bugs here that I need to fix.  I'll do that asap.

    Robert> What is the status of the help system? If it is not working
    Robert> at the moment, what can we do to bring it to a working state?

It seems to work for me, using maxima-local.  (I rarely install the
cvs versions.)  Is there something in particular you would like to see
tested?

Ray

Footnotes: 
[1]  (see
http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/HyperSpec/Body/f_asin_.htm and
http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/HyperSpec/Body/f_sinh_.htm)