What is wrong with this rule?

I am trying to apply rule for the following scenario; but not able to
figure out why the replacement not happening.
Please help me solve:

(%i42) eq1;
	n	 n	  n	   n
       ====     ====	 ====	  ====
       \        \	 \	  \
(%o42)  >	 >	  >	   >	   x(i102, l) x(i104, l) x(i105, l)
       /        /	 /	  /
       ====     ====	 ====	  ====
       i105 = 1 i106 = 1 i104 = 1 i102 = 1
								 x(i106, l)
(%i43) defrule(r1,x(I, L)*x(J, S)*x(M, K)*x(N, T),r(L,K,T));
(%o43) 	      r1 : x(I, L) x(J, S) x(M, K) x(N, T) -> r(L, K, T)
(%i44) disprule(r1);
(%o44) 	      r1 : x(I, L) x(J, S) x(M, K) x(N, T) -> r(L, K, T)
(%i45) apply(apply1,[eq1,r1]);
	n	 n	  n	   n
       ====     ====	 ====	  ====
       \        \	 \	  \
(%o45)  >	 >	  >	   >	   x(i130, l) x(i132, l) x(i133, l)
       /        /	 /	  /
       ====     ====	 ====	  ====
       i133 = 1 i134 = 1 i132 = 1 i130 = 1
								 x(i134, l)


Thanks
Dileep