Robert Dodier writes:
> On 6/9/06, Stavros Macrakis <macrakis at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I like the idea of using "=" to specify options, and I like the idea
>> of an
>> interval operator. Once we have something like x=<<a,b>> for
>> intervals, we
>> naturally expect x=[1,2,3] or x=set(1,2,3) to work as well, which is
>> nice.
>
> It might also be useful to be able to specify a step as well as the
> endpoints.
>
>> However, ":" is not a good choice for the interval operator, as it is
>> already defined as the assignment operator, so "x=a:b" will set a to
>> be and
>> evaluate to "x=a".
>
> There is the possibility that plot2d / plot3d would be argument-quoting
> functions so that syntax like x=a:b would be evaluated in some
> manner other than the default.
>
How about x=a..b notation for interval?
--
Vadim V. Zhytnikov
<vvzhy at mail.ru>
<vvzhy at netorn.ru>