Subject: renaming undocumented Bessel functions g0, g1, gn
From: Robert Dodier
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 13:00:38 -0600
On 8/8/06, Raymond Toy <raymond.toy at ericsson.com> wrote:
> But since you're the first one I know of to complain about it, it
> seems not particularly important to preserve the names.
Agreed, it is not important to preserve the names.
As I was saying, it is OK by me to change them.
> However, maybe we should just get rid of them completely?
Well, I don't see why. The current behavior is slightly flakey as you
pointed out.
However, it seems like an easy fix. I guess it would also help to write some
documentation.
Robert