.mac ? why



I think that .mac and .max should both be acceptable, or for that matter,
.txt or  <nothing>.

just as some of us have gotten used to lisp programs in files that end in
.lisp .lsp .cl  [common lisp]... . :)
[I do not know of any legacy code that would be hurt by allowing .max, also]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: maxima-bounces at math.utexas.edu 
> [mailto:maxima-bounces at math.utexas.edu] On Behalf Of Yigal Weinstein
> Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2006 11:53 AM
> To: maxima at math.utexas.edu
> Subject: .mac ? why
> 
> Is the file extension .mac the only extension for Maxima?  I 
> ask because if it is isn't it time to change .mac -> .max ?  
> Anyone downloading who can read realizes that Maxima came 
> from a program Macsyma, but Maxima has evolved into its own 
> creation and should have its own file extension - no?  I 
> thought a rather superficial question would make my life a 
> little fun. Are there problems with some of the legacy code 
> not be free so .mac is needed for this stuff or what?
> 
> Thanks for indulging me.
> 
> Yigal Weinstein
> _______________________________________________
> Maxima mailing list
> Maxima at math.utexas.edu
> http://www.math.utexas.edu/mailman/listinfo/maxima
>