hi,
On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 12:02 +0100, Hugo Coolens wrote:
>
> Thanks for the quick reply, I changed the syntax as you suggested but
> entering zth[2]; gives:
>
> zth(1) s + 1
>
> ------------------
>
> (zth(1) + 1) s + 1
>
> and not:
>
> (1+2*s)/(1+3*s+s^2)
try
(%i12) radcan( zth[2] );
2 s + 1
(%o12) ------------
2
s + 3 s + 1
Miquel