sen1 at math.msu.edu wrote:
> For what it's worth, I think it would be nice to translate and include
> ARPACK to lisp and maxima.
>
I've looked at this very briefly. It seems possible to convert this to
lisp via f2cl, except for the non-standard "include" statements.
ARPACK, however, requires LAPACK and BLAS to work.
Is there real interest in ARPACK with maxima?
Ray