> -----Original Message-----
> From: maxima-bounces at math.utexas.edu [mailto:maxima-
> bounces at math.utexas.edu] On Behalf Of Raymond Toy
>
.. (f2cl version of lapack)..
It won't be as fast as matlisp, but should be reasonable, if you
> have a Lisp compiler that generates machine code.
>
> Ray
I think LAPACK + BLAS would be very much faster, with tuned BLAS on a
per-architecture basis, than this translated version.
Even if f2cl did a super-efficient job of translation.
Of course if the effort is modest and it results in functionally "correct"
and useful programs, that is a plus. It also shakes down f2cl some more.
RJF